Davis v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Dennis v. State

    498 N.E.2d 1209 (Ind. 1986)   Cited 3 times

    260 Ind. at 355-359, 295 N.E.2d at 824. We find the case at bar more analogous to Davis v. State (1979), Ind. App., 397 N.E.2d 301, where one juror was exposed to the newspaper article. The juror was admonished, but the remaining jurors, who had not been exposed to the article, were not collectively admonished.

  2. Shippen v. State

    477 N.E.2d 903 (Ind. 1985)   Cited 55 times

    This Court will override the jury's assessment of credibility only where the testimony is so incredibly dubious or inherently improbable that no reasonable person could believe it. See, Rosell v. State (1976), 265 Ind. 173, 174, 352 N.E.2d 750, 751; Davis v. State (1979), Ind. App., 397 N.E.2d 301, 302. In arguing that the record conclusively demonstrates that the victim consented to his conduct, Defendant emphasizes her delay in reporting the crime, and argues that her version of the events is inherently incredible.

  3. Jarvis v. State

    441 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. 1982)   Cited 15 times

    Juror Rhodes had skimmed only the News-Dispatch article but did not remember any of it. See Davis v. State, (1979) Ind. App., 397 N.E.2d 301, 303. The trial court asked her about Juror Wade's comment to which she replied, "Just seemed kind of unfair for him to say it."