From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 17, 1922
92 So. 26 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

6 Div. 940.

January 17, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court. Tuscaloosa County; Henry B. Foster, Judge.

J.L. Davis was convicted of failing or refusing to dip tick-infested cattle, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No brief reached the Reporter.


The appellant, on appeal from the county court, was convicted in the circuit court of Tuscaloosa county, Ala., under a complaint which charged:

"That he did have in his possession or in his charge as owner, agent, or otherwise, one or more cattle in a tick-infested or quarantine premise, range, farm, or pasture, that has not been released from state and federal quarantine; that he failed to dip said quarantined animal after receiving legal notice regularly once every two weeks on the day and at the vat specified by the inspector in charge."

The judgment entry recites the overruling of the defendant's motion to quash the complaint. The motion to quash, however, is not set out in the record, and, not being able to ascertain its contents, we are unable to say that the trial court was in error in overruling it. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filling one has expired.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 17, 1922
92 So. 26 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jan 17, 1922

Citations

92 So. 26 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
18 Ala. App. 358