From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Sep 18, 2001
54 S.W.3d 725 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED79066

Filed: September 18, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Hon. Anna C. Forder.

Nancy Lynne Vincent, Assistant Public Defender's Office, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for Appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Linda Lemke, Assistant Attorneys General's Office, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER

Pierre Davis (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Moss v. State, 10 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Mo.banc 2000). We find that the trial court did not clearly err in finding that Appellant's counsel was not ineffective. State v. Hall, 982 S.W.2d 675, 680 (Mo.banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Sep 18, 2001
54 S.W.3d 725 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:PIERRE DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Sep 18, 2001

Citations

54 S.W.3d 725 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)