The State presented evidence that Kirkland personally and directly participated in the criminal acts charged. Davis v. State, 221 Ga. App. 168, 170 (2) ( 471 S.E.2d 14) (1996). Kirkland challenges the decision to excuse a particular juror for cause on the basis of work responsibilities where other jurors were not excused for the same reason.
OCGA ยง 16-8-41 (a). Because the evidence demonstrated completion of the greater offense, no charge on the theft by taking was required. Davis v. State, 221 Ga. App. 168, 170 (3) ( 471 S.E.2d 14) (1996). Accordingly, counsel's failure to request the charge did not constitute a deficiency.