From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 10, 1996
936 S.W.2d 175 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69906

OPINION FILED: December 10, 1996

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas J. Frawley.

Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.



ORDER


Darryl Davis appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find both claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 10, 1996
936 S.W.2d 175 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL DAVIS, Appellant vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Dec 10, 1996

Citations

936 S.W.2d 175 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)