From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 11, 1985
480 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 85-242.

December 11, 1985.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Michael E. Raiden, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Gary O. Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


In our initial opinion of August 16, 1985, we reversed appellant's sentence on the ground that the trial court's application of the guidelines rule in effect at the time of sentencing, rather than the rule in effect when the crimes were committed, was unlawful. Since that date, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), in which it stated that a modification in the sentencing guidelines procedure is merely a procedural change which does not require the application of the ex post facto doctrine. The court remanded Jackson for resentencing under the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing. Therefore, on the authority of Jackson, we withdraw our initial opinion and affirm appellant's sentence.

Affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 11, 1985
480 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD W. DAVIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 11, 1985

Citations

480 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Pete v. State

A rule change that has a disadvantageous effect on an offender does not apply to crimes committed before the…

Kerr v. State

Therefore, on the authority of Jackson, we hold that it was not error for the trial court to use the revised…