Opinion
No. SC10-1687.
November 19, 2010.
Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D10-1897, 04-003234JJL.
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to reinstatement of her appeal in Case No. 1D10-1897, she is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 357 So. 2d 464, 466 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
Petitioner's "Motion to Compel Employer Carrier to Comply With Section 440.192(8)" is hereby denied as moot.
LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.