From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Skillen

United States District Court, District of Montana
Aug 27, 2024
CV 23-91-BLG-DWM (D. Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-91-BLG-DWM

08-27-2024

KEVIN DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SHANE SKILLEN, and JASON RUFF, Defendants.


ORDER

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge United States District Court

Plaintiff Kevin Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint related to his arrest and detention in Billings, Montana. (Doc. 14). The case was briefly stayed while Davis's prosecution was underway. After the stay was lifted, Davis filed an Amended Complaint. Davis's Amended Complaint failed to state a federal claim for relief, so he was given the opportunity to amend. (Doc. 15.) His Second Amended Complaint also fails to state a claim. (Doc. 16.) Davis made none of the changes required to state a claim by the Court's prior Order. (Doc. 15.) For the reasons explained therein, Davis's Complaint is dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Davis's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and enter judgment.

2. The Clerk of Court shall have the docket reflect that this dismissal counts as a strike against Davis within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and that any appeal of this Order would be frivolous.


Summaries of

Davis v. Skillen

United States District Court, District of Montana
Aug 27, 2024
CV 23-91-BLG-DWM (D. Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Davis v. Skillen

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SHANE SKILLEN, and JASON RUFF, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

CV 23-91-BLG-DWM (D. Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)