From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 5, 2012
2012-7107 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 5, 2012)

Opinion

2012-7107

07-05-2012

HAROLD v. DAVIS, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Veterans Claims in case no. 10-0396, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Harold V. Davis moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Davis has not submitted Federal Circuit Form 6, which is required by this court for such motions. Moreover, because Mr. Davis is a prisoner, he is also required to submit Federal Circuit Form 6A, an authorization form.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied without prejudice to Davis refiling a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis along with a completed Federal Circuit Form 6 and Form 6A. Davis's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the proper forms is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

____________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Harold V. Davis

James R. Sweet, Esq.

s24


Summaries of

Davis v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 5, 2012
2012-7107 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD v. DAVIS, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 5, 2012

Citations

2012-7107 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 5, 2012)