From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Shinseki

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Feb 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv673-MEF (M.D. Ala. Feb. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv673-MEF.

February 3, 2011


ORDER


On January 11, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 25). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. # 20) is GRANTED, judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that the costs of this proceeding be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff.

Done this the 3rd day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Davis v. Shinseki

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Feb 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv673-MEF (M.D. Ala. Feb. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Davis v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary, Department of…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv673-MEF (M.D. Ala. Feb. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Muhammad v. Bethel-Muhammad

Accord Kashelkar v. Bluestone, 306 Fed. Appx. 690, 692 (2nd Cir. 2009); Jones v. TD Bank, 2012 WL 834252 at…

Morrell v. Lunceford

Therefore, Plaintiffs have no basis upon which to maintain a private cause of action for its violation. Cf.,…