From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Sheena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1184 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1184 CKD P

12-06-2012

TERRENCE L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SHEENA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 13) is denied.

_____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/md
davi1184.31


Summaries of

Davis v. Sheena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1184 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Sheena

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SHEENA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1184 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2012)