Opinion
Gen. No. 41,225. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed November 4, 1940 Rehearing denied, November 18, 1940
STIPULATIONS, § 6 — foreclosure decree. Foreclosure proceedings were properly instituted by one who testified that she held note for the benefit of the real owner, stipulation by parties in open court consenting to foreclosure decree was binding, where decree recites that it is entered pursuant to stipulation it will be presumed that such consent was given, consent decree cannot be reviewed by appeal or writ of error, and it is not necessary that decree recite stipulation if it appears in the record.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. HARRY M. FISHER, presiding.
Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at April term, 1940.
Hector A. Brouillet, for appellant Charles Sedman;
Louis W. Mack, pro se;
Sonnenschein, Berkson, Lautmann, Levinson Morse, for certain appellees.
Zimmerman Norman for certain other appellee; Roger S. Block, Edward A. Zimmerman and I.E. Ferguson, of counsel.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed November 4, 1940; rehearing denied, November 18, 1940.