From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jun 20, 2012
CV 11-00715-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Jun. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CV 11-00715-PHX-FJM

06-20-2012

Cleopheus Davis, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan; Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents.


ORDER

The court has before it petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1), respondents' response (doc. 13), and petitioner's reply (doc. 15). We also have before us the magistrate judge's report and recommendation recommending that the petition be denied (doc. 17). We granted petitioner's request for an extension of time to respond (doc. 19). However, petitioner did not file objections to the report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, we accept the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

IT IS ORDERED ACCEPTING the report and recommendation (doc. 17) and DENYING petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk shall enter judgment.

____________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jun 20, 2012
CV 11-00715-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Jun. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Cleopheus Davis, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan; Attorney General of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Citations

CV 11-00715-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Jun. 20, 2012)