From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 19, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1898 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1898 FCD EFB P.

March 19, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. On February 6, 2007, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Ex Parte Notice of Motion Motion for Order to Show Cause," requesting the court to direct L.T.A. Willaims (presumably a librarian) and the warden of High Desert State Prison to explain why the plaintiff is being denied access to the law library and prevented from filing an amended complaint. However, on February 20, 2007, plaintiff filed his amended complaint. By separate order, the court accepted this complaint as timely filed. Therefore, the court declines to direct L.T.A. Williams and the warden of High Desert State Prison to explain plaintiff's alleged lack of access to the law library.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff's February 6, 2007, request is denied.


Summaries of

Davis v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 19, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1898 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Davis v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES T. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. D. L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 19, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1898 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2007)