From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Reilly

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Oct 20, 2006
Civil Action No. 3:05CV75, (BROADWATER) (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:05CV75, (BROADWATER).

October 20, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On this day the above styled case came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate John S. Kaull (Doc. No. 19), dated April 14, 2006, and petitioner's corresponding objections (Doc. No. 20), filed April 26, 2006. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court conducted a de novo review of the above. As a result, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) should be, and is hereby, ORDERED adopted.

The Court further ORDERS that petitioner's § 2241 motion ( Doc. No. 1) be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, this action shall be STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court.

The Clerk is directed to transmit true copies of this Order to the petitioner and all counsel of record herein.


Summaries of

Davis v. Reilly

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Oct 20, 2006
Civil Action No. 3:05CV75, (BROADWATER) (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Davis v. Reilly

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE DAVIS, Petitioner, v. EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg

Date published: Oct 20, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:05CV75, (BROADWATER) (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2006)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Reilly

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…