From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Prison Health Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2011
No. C 09-2629 SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 09-2629 SI

11-09-2011

FREDDIE M. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL., Defendant.


ORDER RE: IN LIMINE MOTIONS

Defendant has filed motion in limine no. 2 to "preclude reference to the amount of and rationale for the settlement between plaintiff and the PHS defendants." Plaintiff has filed a statement of non-opposition to that motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS defendant's motion in limine no 2. Docket No. 139.

The Court's October 6, 2011 final pretrial order reserved judgment on defendant's motion in limine no. B regarding the NLRB charges against PHS. After further review of the parties' arguments and Plummer v. Western Int'l Hotels Co., Inc., 656 F.2d 502 (9th Cir. 1981), the Court rules as follows: the NLRB probable cause charges against PHS are relevant and admissible provided that plaintiff first introduces evidence showing that defendants acted in concert with PHS to violate plaintiff's First Amendment and other civil rights.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Prison Health Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2011
No. C 09-2629 SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Davis v. Prison Health Servs.

Case Details

Full title:FREDDIE M. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

No. C 09-2629 SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)