From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Phoenix Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Mississippi
May 8, 1972
261 So. 2d 460 (Miss. 1972)

Summary

In Davis v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 111 Cal. 409 [43 P. 1115], it was held that it is not necessary that the insured person have a legal interest in the property insured; but an equitable interest is sufficient, and it is not required that there be a valid equitable title, provided the insured has possession and use, and has a direct pecuniary interest in the preservation of the property, and will suffer a pecuniary loss as an immediate and proximate result of its destruction.

Summary of this case from Martin v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 46610.

April 3, 1972. Rehearing Denied May 8, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Harry G. Walker, J..

Sekul, Hornsby, Wallace Blessey, Biloxi, for appellants.

Bryant Stennis, Gulfport, Watkins Eager, Joe W. Hobbs, Jackson, for appellee.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Davis v. Phoenix Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Mississippi
May 8, 1972
261 So. 2d 460 (Miss. 1972)

In Davis v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 111 Cal. 409 [43 P. 1115], it was held that it is not necessary that the insured person have a legal interest in the property insured; but an equitable interest is sufficient, and it is not required that there be a valid equitable title, provided the insured has possession and use, and has a direct pecuniary interest in the preservation of the property, and will suffer a pecuniary loss as an immediate and proximate result of its destruction.

Summary of this case from Martin v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Davis v. Phoenix Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Mrs. Syd DAVIS and Mrs. Ester Ann Shiffman, Appellants, v. PHOENIX…

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: May 8, 1972

Citations

261 So. 2d 460 (Miss. 1972)

Citing Cases

Burns v. California Fair Plan Assn.

[Citation.]" ( Davis v. Phoenix Ins. Co., supra, 111 Cal. at p. 415.) If an insured's interest "extends to…

Martin v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

This was an action on a fire insurance policy. In Davis v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 111 Cal. 409 [43 P. 1115], it…