From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 11-3956 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-3956 CW

10-28-2011

FAINE DAVIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NORDSTROM, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING CLARIFICATION OF COURT'S ORDER RELATING CASES AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULES

(Docket No. 17)

On October 21, 2011, Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. filed an administrative motion requesting clarification of this Court's order of October 18, 2011 (Docket No. 14). Defendant represents that its Motion to Compel Arbitration has already been fully briefed. Specifically, after Defendant filed the Motion to Compel Arbitration on September 16, 2011, Plaintiff Faine Davis filed an Opposition on September 30, 2011 and Defendant filed a Reply in Support of its Motion on October 7, 2011.

Defendant is correct that no additional briefing is necessary on the Motion to Compel Arbitration. The hearing date is maintained for December 8, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 11-3956 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FAINE DAVIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-3956 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)