From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Neuschmid

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:18-cv-2682 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-2682 JAM AC P

06-01-2021

DORIAN DAVIS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Respondent. v.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 7, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 7. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued April 7, 2021 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED in full;

2. This action is DISMISSED, and

3. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Davis v. Neuschmid

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:18-cv-2682 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. Neuschmid

Case Details

Full title:DORIAN DAVIS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Respondent. v.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-2682 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)