From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Miller

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 2, 2023
Civil Action 1:18-CV-2286 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:18-CV-2286

10-02-2023

DAMION G. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MILLER, et al., Defendants.


BRANN, J.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

KAROLINE MEHALCHICK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presently before the Court is a motion to counteroffer (Doc. 137) and motion to compel (Doc. 157), along with a motion to strike the motion to compel (Doc. 158). This matter was resolved during a settlement conference before the undersigned on June 20, 2023, and the latest document filed by Plaintiff indicates that settlement of this matter is complete. As such, it is recommended that the outstanding motions be struck as moot, and the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.

NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the undersigned has entered the foregoing Report and Recommendation dated October 2, 2023. Any party may obtain a review of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 72.3, which provides:

Any party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings, recommendations or report addressing a motion or matter described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) or making a recommendation for the disposition of a prisoner case or a habeas corpus petition within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Such party shall file with the clerk of court, and serve on the magistrate judge and all parties, written objections which shall specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings, recommendations or report to which objection is made and the basis for such objections. The briefing requirements set forth in Local Rule 72.2 shall apply. A judge shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge, however, need conduct a new hearing only in his or her discretion or where required by law, and may consider the record developed before the magistrate judge, making his or her own determination on the basis of that record. The judge may also receive further evidence, recall witnesses or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.


Summaries of

Davis v. Miller

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 2, 2023
Civil Action 1:18-CV-2286 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Davis v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:DAMION G. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MILLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:18-CV-2286 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2023)