Opinion
2:23-cv-01352-APG-BNW
10-31-2023
MATTHEW DAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. META PLATFORMS, INC. Defendant.
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC MICHAEL N. FEDER (NV Bar No. 7332) GABRIEL A. BLUMBERG (NV Bar No. 12332) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP ELIZABETH K. McCLOSKEY (CA Bar No. 268184) (pro hac vice forthcoming) Attorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. KEMP JONES, LLP DON SPRINGMEYER (NV Bar No. 1021) BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. NEAL J. DECKANT (CA Bar No. 322946) (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC MICHAEL N. FEDER (NV Bar No. 7332) GABRIEL A. BLUMBERG (NV Bar No. 12332) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP ELIZABETH K. McCLOSKEY (CA Bar No. 268184) (pro hac vice forthcoming) Attorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.
KEMP JONES, LLP DON SPRINGMEYER (NV Bar No. 1021) BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. NEAL J. DECKANT (CA Bar No. 322946) (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT META PLATFORMS, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND TO SET MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE (SECOND REQUEST)
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, and Local Rule 7-1, and the Chamber Practices of the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, Plaintiff Matthew Davis (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, this action was filed on August 30, 2023;
WHEREAS, this is the second stipulation for an extension of time for Meta to respond to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, Meta's deadline to respond to the Complaint is currently set for October 27, 2023;
WHEREAS, Meta intends to file a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Meta met and conferred regarding the deadline for Meta to respond to the Complaint and agreed to extend this deadline by fourteen (14) days to November 10, 2023, to set a deadline of December 1, 2023 for Plaintiff's opposition to Meta's motion to dismiss, and to set a deadline of December 15, 2023 for Meta's reply in support of its motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS, the proposed stipulated extension will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court; and, WHEREAS, this stipulation is without prejudice to any defense Meta might assert in this action:
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Meta hereby stipulate and agree to the following schedule:
1. Meta's deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be extended by fourteen (14) days to November 10, 2023;
2. Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition to Meta's motion to dismiss shall be December 1, 2023;
3. Meta's deadline to file a reply in support of its motion to dismiss shall be December 15, 2023.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT META PLATFORMS, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND SETTING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Matthew Davis (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.'s (“Meta”) Stipulation To Extend Time for Meta Platforms, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Set Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule. The Court has determined, for good cause shown:
1. Meta's deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be extended by fourteen (14) days to November 10, 2023;
2. Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition to Meta's motion to dismiss shall be December 1, 2023;
3. Meta's deadline to file a reply in support of its motion to dismiss shall be December 15, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED: