From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Martin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Dec 9, 1896
15 Tex. Civ. App. 62 (Tex. Civ. App. 1896)

Opinion

Decided December 9, 1896.

Judgment not Final — Appeal.

A judgment which fails to dispose of the rights of all of the parties to the suit is not final and no appeal lies therefrom.

APPEAL from the County Court of Coryell County. Tried below before Hon. T.C. TAYLOR.

Owens Miller, for appellants.

Stinnett Bros. and Arnold West, for appellees.


Opinion. — The judgment appealed from does not dispose of S.H. Henderson and Smith Coffey, both of whom are parties to the suit, and hence there is no final judgment, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Martin v. Crow, 28 Tex. 614 [ 28 Tex. 614]; Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Tex. 241 [ 42 Tex. 241]; Linn v. Arambould, 55 Tex. 611 [ 55 Tex. 611], Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Tex. 18; Mills v. Paul, 1 Texas Civ. App. 415[ 1 Tex. Civ. App. 415]; 23 S.W. Rep., 394.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Davis v. Martin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Dec 9, 1896
15 Tex. Civ. App. 62 (Tex. Civ. App. 1896)
Case details for

Davis v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:C.F. DAVIS ET AL. v. W.C. MARTIN

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 9, 1896

Citations

15 Tex. Civ. App. 62 (Tex. Civ. App. 1896)
38 S.W. 599

Citing Cases

G., H. S. A. Ry. Co. v. Mohrmann

rder to find for defendant, not only to find that the plaintiff, in performing his duties in preparing the…

Yerby v. Heineken Vogelsang

If the judgment appealed from or the orders of the court below did not dispose of the plaintiffs, or if the…