From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2016
Case No. CV 13-8179-GW(LAL) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-8179-GW(LAL)

10-17-2016

JOVIAN WILLIAM DAVIS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections generally lack merit for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: October 17, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003).


Summaries of

Davis v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2016
Case No. CV 13-8179-GW(LAL) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Davis v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:JOVIAN WILLIAM DAVIS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 13-8179-GW(LAL) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)