Opinion
2015-04-29
Brian Davis, Stormville, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Jason Harrow of counsel), for respondent.
Brian Davis, Stormville, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Jason Harrow of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated January 18, 2014, which confirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated December 14, 2013, made after a tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules 107.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][8][i] ) and 107.11 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][8][ii] ), and imposing penalties.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's determination that the petitioner violated the subject prison disciplinary rules ( see Matter of La Puma v. Lee, 115 A.D.3d 745, 746, 981 N.Y.S.2d 610; Matter of Berkoviz v. Lee, 102 A.D.3d 866, 867, 958 N.Y.S.2d 450; Matter of Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional Facility, 95 A.D.3d 1331, 1332, 944 N.Y.S.2d 910; Matter of Salvatierra v. Weeden, 88 A.D.3d 728, 729, 930 N.Y.S.2d 479).
Furthermore, contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report adequately complied with 7 NYCRR 251–3.1(a) and contained the necessary specificity to apprise the petitioner of the charges against him so as to enable him to prepare an adequate defense ( see Matter of Berkoviz v. Lee, 102 A.D.3d at 867, 958 N.Y.S.2d 450; Matter of Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional Facility, 95 A.D.3d at 1332, 944 N.Y.S.2d 910; Matter of Salvatierra v. Weeden, 88 A.D.3d at 729, 930 N.Y.S.2d 479).