From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0821 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0821 LKK KJM P.

August 28, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Plaintiff has also requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to the defendants' July 24, 2006 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, the request will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's August 16, 2006 request for the appointment of counsel is denied;

2. Plaintiff's August 16, 2006 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to the defendants' July 24, 2006 motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Davis v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0821 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Davis v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. M. KNOWLES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0821 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)