From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2020
Case No. CV 18-7553 JAK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CV 18-7553 JAK (PVC)

08-07-2020

JERMOND CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Petitioner, v. RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden, et al., Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the First Amended Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. \\ \\ \\ \\

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his current address of record and on counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: August 7, 2020

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2020
Case No. CV 18-7553 JAK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Davis v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JERMOND CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Petitioner, v. RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 18-7553 JAK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2020)