From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2019
Case No. CV 19-144-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 19-144-JLS (KK)

07-02-2019

MARQUISE DAVIS, Petitioner, v. JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and (2) Claim One of the Petition is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order, Respondent must file an Answer responding to Claims Two and Three of the Petition. At the time the Answer is filed, Respondent shall lodge with the Court all records bearing on the merits of Petitioner's claims, including the briefs specified in Rule 5(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may then file a Reply responding to matters raised in the Answer within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the Answer. Dated: July 2, 2019

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2019
Case No. CV 19-144-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Davis v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MARQUISE DAVIS, Petitioner, v. JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 19-144-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2019)