Opinion
3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC
06-10-2021
LAVAROS DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MARK INCH, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 14, 2021. ECF Doc. 9. Plaintiff was furnished with a copy of the Report and Recommendation and was afforded an opportunity to file an objection pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Mark Inch, Warden Clemmons, A. Flores, J. Santiago, Nurse Dow (sic), Nurse Sing, and Dr. Rodriguez are DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.
3. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Mark Inch, Warden Clemmons, A. Flores, J. Santiago, Nurse Dow (sic), Nurse Sing, and Dr. Rodriguez on all claims.
4. The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings.