From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Holloway

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 14, 1980
265 S.E.2d 264 (S.C. 1980)

Opinion

21195

April 14, 1980.

Richard H. Warder, Greenville, for appellant. Rhoten N. Shetley and Tommy J. Lattimore, Greenville, for respondent.


April 14, 1980.


Appellant Sandra Ruth Davis appeals from an order declaring respondent Sammy Holloway not to be the father of her four year old child. We reverse.

After appellant testified, the family court dismissed her petition on its own motion. Since this is an action in equity heard by the family court judge alone, we review the record to determine the greater weight of the evidence. Jones v. Jones, 270 S.C. 280, 241 S.E.2d 904 (1978); Wood v. Wood, 269 S.C. 600, 239 S.E.2d 315 (1977).

The only evidence presented at trial were the results of a blood test and appellant's testimony. The blood test did not exclude respondent as the child's father. Appellant testified she had not had sexual relations with anyone other than respondent and he, while never admitting paternity, had not denied it when confronted.

We hold this evidence made out a prima facie case of paternity and shifted the burden of proof to respondent. Since the family court's dismissal of the action on its own motion prevented him from presenting his case, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

LEWIS, C.J., and LITTLEJOHN, GREGORY and HARWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. Holloway

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 14, 1980
265 S.E.2d 264 (S.C. 1980)
Case details for

Davis v. Holloway

Case Details

Full title:Sandra Ruth DAVIS, Appellant, v. Sammy HOLLOWAY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 14, 1980

Citations

265 S.E.2d 264 (S.C. 1980)
265 S.E.2d 264

Citing Cases

S.C. Dept. of Social Services v. Parker

Our scope of review requires us to review the record to determine the greater weight of the evidence.…

S.C. Dept. of Social Services v. Johnson

As this is an action in equity, heard by the Family Court Judge alone, this Court has jurisdiction to review…