From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Hightower

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahasse Division
Jan 17, 2008
CASE NO. 4:06CV186-MP/AK (N.D. Fla. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:06CV186-MP/AK.

January 17, 2008


ORDER


Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery, with proposed discovery attached. (Doc. 85). Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, and the attached proposed discovery is deemed served upon Defendants on this date. Since Rule 34 Requests for Production of Documents should be served on parties to a lawsuit and the attorney general is not a defendant, the requests shall be deemed served on the defendants collectively.

By granting this motion and directing that the discovery be served, the Court is in no way commenting on the particular discovery requests and the rules regarding objections still apply.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Hightower

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahasse Division
Jan 17, 2008
CASE NO. 4:06CV186-MP/AK (N.D. Fla. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Davis v. Hightower

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY EARL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CANDY HIGHTOWER, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahasse Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 4:06CV186-MP/AK (N.D. Fla. Jan. 17, 2008)