From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Eckstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Oct 15, 2020
Case No. 20-cv-1220-pp (E.D. Wis. Oct. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 20-cv-1220-pp

10-15-2020

ALLAN DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ECKSTEIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FULL FILING FEE

The plaintiff, a Wisconsin state prisoner who is representing himself, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. The plaintiff did not send the filing fee along with his complaint, so the clerk's office sent him a letter on August 10, 2020, instructing him that within twenty-one days he had to either pay the full civil case filing fee of $400 or file a motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. Dkt. No. 2. The plaintiff did not do either of those things by August 31, 2020.

Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a prisoner plaintiff may not bring a civil action without prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis)

if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). "Strikes" include any prisoner case dismissed on any of the three enumerated grounds before or after the enactment of the PLRA. Evans v. Ill. Dep't of Corrs., 150 F.3d 810, 811 (7th Cir. 1998) (citing Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996)). Court records show that the plaintiff has filed over twenty-one cases in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, and he received his third strike in Davis v. King, 99-cv-822-MLG, Dkt. No. 6 (E.D. Wis. September 27, 1999). The imminent danger exception does not apply to this case because the plaintiff's complaint involves three completed acts of alleged harm that occurred on March 21, 22 and 27, 2018, and the plaintiff asks only for monetary relief, not an injunction or any other immediate action. See Dkt. No. 1 at 1, 14-15; see also Heimermann v. Litscher, 337 F.3d 781, 782 (7th Cir. 2003) (concluding that the imminent danger exception to §1915(g)'s three strikes rule is available "for genuine emergencies," where "time is pressing" and "a threat . . . is real and proximate."). The plaintiff may not proceed without prepaying the filing fee.

On September 25, 2020, the court issued an order, telling the plaintiff that if he wanted to proceed with this lawsuit, he must pay the full civil case filing fee of $400 (the $350 filing fee plus the $50 administrative fee that applies to litigants not proceeding in forma pauperis) in time for the court to receive it by the end of the day on October 13, 2020. Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 433-34 (7th Cir. 1997), rev'd on other grounds by Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000) and Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); 7th Cir. R. 3(b). The court advised the plaintiff that failure to pay by that deadline would result in dismissal of the case. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 434.

The October 13, 2020 deadline has passed, and the court has not received the filing fee. The court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee. The clerk will enter judgment accordingly.

Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 15thday of October, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ _________

HON. PAMELA PEPPER

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Eckstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Oct 15, 2020
Case No. 20-cv-1220-pp (E.D. Wis. Oct. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Davis v. Eckstein

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ECKSTEIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Oct 15, 2020

Citations

Case No. 20-cv-1220-pp (E.D. Wis. Oct. 15, 2020)