From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Durant

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 27, 2022
2:21-cv-1043 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1043 JAM AC P

06-27-2022

DWIGHT DELTON DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. M. DURANT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a second motion for a settlement conference. ECF No. 36.

As the court explained in denying plaintiff's previous motion, defendants' motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project has been granted, and the court will not order the parties to participate in a settlement conference at this time. Plaintiff is reminded that he is free to communicate with defendants' counsel regarding the possibility of settlement and that any such communications should be sent directly to counsel and should not be filed with the court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference (ECF No. 36) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Durant

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 27, 2022
2:21-cv-1043 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Davis v. Durant

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT DELTON DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. M. DURANT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 27, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-1043 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)