From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Deville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0358 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0358

11-30-2017

ROGER DALE DAVIS, JR. v. WARDEN KEITH DEVILLE


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED that Roger Dale Davis, Jr.'s Petition (Record Document 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The Court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability. Jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and whether this court was correct in its procedural ruling. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484,120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604 (2000).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this the 30th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Davis v. Deville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0358 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Davis v. Deville

Case Details

Full title:ROGER DALE DAVIS, JR. v. WARDEN KEITH DEVILLE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0358 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2017)