From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 25, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-3241 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-3241 WBS CKD P

07-25-2012

DONALD DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVIS Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 20, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2012, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's claim against defendant Davis for violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is dismissed.

____________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 25, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-3241 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DONALD DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVIS Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 25, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-3241 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2012)