From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Correctional Corporation of America

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 13, 2006
Case No. 05-3489-SAC (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-3489-SAC.

January 13, 2006


ORDER


Before the court is a complaint filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 by a prisoner confined in a Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) facility in Leavenworth, Kansas. Also before the court is plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action without prepayment of the district court filing fee is required to submit an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets, a statement of the nature of the complaint, and the affiant's belief that he is entitled to redress, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), and to submit a certified copy of the inmate's institutional account for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the action from an appropriate official from each prison in which the inmate is or was incarcerated, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Because plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis includes no certified financial records, the court directs plaintiff to supplement the motion with this necessary information. The failure to do so in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this action based on plaintiff's failure to either pay the $250.00 district court filing fee, or to comply with the statutory requirements for seeking leave to proceed without prepayment of the fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Plaintiff is further directed to supplement the complaint to demonstrate full exhaustion of administrative remedies on his claims. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) ("No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.").

Although plaintiff broadly cites his attempt at informal administrative resolution of his claim on July 27, 2005, this is insufficient. See Steele v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 355 F.3d 1204, 1210 (10th Cir. 2003) (pleading requirement imposed by § 1997e(a) requires a prisoner to attach a copy of applicable administrative dispositions to the complaint, or to "describe with specificity the administrative proceeding and its outcome"), cert. denied 125 S.Ct. 344 (2004). Courts are not to read futility into the § 1997e(a) exhaustion requirement. See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731 (2001) (§ 1997e(a) requires prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies irrespective of the relief sought and offered through administrative channels). Plaintiff must make a greater showing that no formal administrative grievance procedure exists at the CCA facility.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to submit the certified financial records required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), or to pay the $250.00 district court filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to supplement the complaint to avoid dismissal of the complaint without prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Correctional Corporation of America

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 13, 2006
Case No. 05-3489-SAC (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Davis v. Correctional Corporation of America

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD M. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA …

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jan 13, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-3489-SAC (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2006)