From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Cnty. of El Dorado

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:22-cv-00262-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00262-MCE-JDP

06-01-2022

RICKY DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al. Defendants.

BRUCE A. KILDAY DERICK E. KONZ JACOB J. GRAHAM ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP


BRUCE A. KILDAY

DERICK E. KONZ

JACOB J. GRAHAM

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS STRASSER, FITZGERALD, AND THE COUNTY OF EL DORADO'S DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS REPLY BRIEFS

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Good cause appearing, and based on stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' application to extend their deadline to file motion to dismiss reply briefs.

Wherefore, Defendants RICHARD STRASSER, RICK FITZGERALD, and the COUNTY OF EL DORADO have until June 16, 2022 to file timely reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 12 & 13).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Cnty. of El Dorado

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:22-cv-00262-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Davis v. Cnty. of El Dorado

Case Details

Full title:RICKY DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00262-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)