From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 18-7074 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7074

01-25-2019

CLAUDE DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Claude Davis, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00062-RAJ-LRL) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Claude Davis seeks to appeal the district court's order finding no clear error in the magistrate judge's order granting Harold Clarke's motion for an extension of time and denying as moot Davis' motion for default judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Davis v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 18-7074 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Davis v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7074 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)