From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. City of Richmond

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
20-cv-02774 SBA (N.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-02774 SBA

07-16-2021

MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Defendants.


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG Senior United States District Judge

The Court has been advised that the Parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. Dkt. No. 53. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED. All scheduled dates are VACATED. In the event that the settlement is not realized, any party may move to reopen the case and pretrial/trial dates will be reset, provided such motion is filed within 90 days of the date this order is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. City of Richmond

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
20-cv-02774 SBA (N.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. City of Richmond

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

20-cv-02774 SBA (N.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)