From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2017
NO. CV 16-7974-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2017)

Opinion

NO. CV 16-7974-JAK (AGR)

01-13-2017

JERMOND CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

The postal service has returned the mail to Petitioner's address of record as undeliverable. (Dkt. Nos. 9, 10.) A party proceeding pro se is required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address. Local Rule 41-6. Petitioner has failed to file a notice of change of address, and his address is unknown.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: January 13, 2017

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2017
NO. CV 16-7974-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Davis v. California

Case Details

Full title:JERMOND CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

Citations

NO. CV 16-7974-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2017)