Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-00745-BAJ-RLB
09-18-2014
RULING AND ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner's APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (Doc. 1). The Magistrate Judge has issued a REPORT (Doc. 4), recommending that "Petitioner's Application for Writ of Mandamus be denied and that this action be dismissed," and, further, that the Court deny Petitioner a certificate of appealability, (id. at p. 8). Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report. (Doc. 5).
Having carefully considered Petitioner's APPLICATION (Doc. 1) and related filings—including Petitioner's objections (Doc. 5)—the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's REPORT (Doc. 4) and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter.
Accordingly, for the reasons explained in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 4),
IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has failed to "ma[ke] a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 18th day of September, 2014.
/s/_________
BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA