From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Ayers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Jul 23, 2012
CASE NO: 1:12-cv-61 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO: 1:12-cv-61 (WLS)

07-23-2012

MICHAEL DAVIS aka, WALI MALIK DAWUD, Plaintiff, v. DR. AYERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed June 1, 2012. (Doc. 8). It is recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Dr. Ayers, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for (1) Dr. Ayers's failure to train and supervise the nurses and physician's assistant involved in the care of Plaintiff's injured jaw, and (2) Dr. Ayers's attempt to coerce Plaintiff to dismiss his grievance charge. (Id. at 5-6).

The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days from the date of its service to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id. at 6). The period for filing objections expired on Monday, June 18, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket).

The Parties were given an additional three days because service was made by mail. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (adding three days to specified period within which a party may act if service is made under Rule 5(b)(2)(C) by mailing process to a party's last known address).

In view of the absence of any objections from the record of this case, the Court's consideration of the record of the case as a whole, and the Court's determination of the reasonableness of the findings and legal basis of the Recommendation, U.S. Magistrate Judge Langstaff's June 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. The Court therefore DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims (1) that Dr. Ayers is vicariously liable for Plaintiff's injuries due to his failure to train and supervise the nurses and physician's assistant and (2) that Dr. Ayers attempted to coerce Plaintiff into dismissing a grievance. Plaintiff's remaining claims of direct liability against Dr. Ayers, Nurse Montgomery, P.A. Edward, Jane Doe Nurse 1, and Jane Doe Nurse 2 for Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs shall proceed.

________________________

THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Davis v. Ayers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Jul 23, 2012
CASE NO: 1:12-cv-61 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Ayers

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAVIS aka, WALI MALIK DAWUD, Plaintiff, v. DR. AYERS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

Citations

CASE NO: 1:12-cv-61 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Jay

The cases cited by Plaintiff, though not binding, are still more relevant. For example, in Davis v. Ayers,…

Peacock v. Tucker

Here, construing Peacock's Complaint liberally, Peacock alleged a serious medical condition in connection…