From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Mar 28, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-32 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-CV-32

03-28-2012

DEBORAH D. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


(Phillips/Guyton)


JUDGMENT ORDER

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this order, the objections to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge filed by plaintiff [Doc. 14] are hereby OVERRULED. The report and recommendation [Doc. 13] is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 9] is DENIED; the defendant Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 11] is GRANTED; the defendant Commissioner's decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge

ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT

Debra C. Poplin

CLERK OF COURT


Summaries of

Davis v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Mar 28, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-32 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH D. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-CV-32 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 28, 2012)