From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Andrews

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Nov 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-902-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 29, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-902-ID (WO).

November 29, 2010


ORDER


Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #7), and Plaintiff's Objection, (Doc. #8). Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. #8) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;
3. Plaintiff's claims for monetary damages against Jerry White, Butch Binford, and Max Andrews be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii);
4. Plaintiff's conspiracy claim be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and
5. To the extent the Plaintiff presents claims challenging the constitutionality of a criminal charge pending against him before the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama, these claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE this the 29th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Davis v. Andrews

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Nov 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-902-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Davis v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:DEMARLOS DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MAX ANDREWS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 29, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-902-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 29, 2010)