Opinion
Docket Number WD 52277.
November 19, 1996.
APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF PLATTE, MISSOURI THE WARD B. STUCKEY, JUDGE.
Daniel R. Dykstra, Esq., Kansas City, MO, and Jeffery Spencer Henry, Esq., Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondents.
Mathew F. Mulhern, Esq., Kansas City, MO, and Steven Douglas Wolcott, Esq., Liberty, MO, Attorneys for Appellants.
Ellis, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ.
ORDER
The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the spouse on a loss of services claim against the tortfeasor's insurer. The policy language, which defined "loss of services" to be the same as "bodily injury" was deemed ambiguous, allowing a construction that would allow separate limit claims for both the physically injured plaintiff as well as his spouse.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).