From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Alexandre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 16, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-883-P (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-883-P

03-16-2018

CECIL MCDONALD DAVIS, Plaintiff v. DR. JOEL ALEXANDRE, Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (Docs. 23, 31), and after a de novo review of the record including the objections filed by Plaintiff (Docs. 26, 34), and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Davis's complaint be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice under § 1915(e)(2)(b) and § 1915A, except for Davis's claims against Warden Sanders and Dr. Gapasin, which should be dismissed without prejudice, subject to a determination by the Western District of Missouri as to whether its order was a final judgment.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, this 16th day of March, 2018.

/s/ _________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Alexandre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 16, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-883-P (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Davis v. Alexandre

Case Details

Full title:CECIL MCDONALD DAVIS, Plaintiff v. DR. JOEL ALEXANDRE, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-883-P (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2018)

Citing Cases

Culp v. Alexandre

However, that suit dealt with claims of deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment, not medical…