From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Adams

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 14, 2011
2:10cv1108, Electronic Fling (W.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2011)

Opinion

2:10cv1108, Electronic Fling.

July 14, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On March 22, 2011, Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5), that recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice. It further recommended that the plaintiff be permitted to re-file this action within the applicable statute of limitation period by paying the full filing fee of $350.00. The plaintiff was served at his address of record, S.C.I. Mahanoy, 301 Morea Road, Frackville, PA 17932. The plaintiff was advised he was allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file written objections to the report and recommendation. As of the date of this order, the plaintiff has filed no objections. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2011;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff be permitted to re-file this action within the applicable statute of limitation period by paying the full filing fee of $350.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 5) of Chief Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated March 22, 2011, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Davis v. Adams

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 14, 2011
2:10cv1108, Electronic Fling (W.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Davis v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:GARY DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ADAMS, Duquesne Police Officer; HAROLD…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 14, 2011

Citations

2:10cv1108, Electronic Fling (W.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2011)