From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis-Rice v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. C 11-3203 MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-3203 MMC

10-18-2011

ASTARTE DAVIS-RICE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING; CONTINUING HEARING

Before the Court is defendant United States of America's ("the government") Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Pre-filing Screening Order or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Case, filed September 7, 2011 ("Motion"). Plaintiff Astarte Davis-Rice ("Davis-Rice") has filed opposition thereto, to which the government has replied.

By the instant action, Davis-Rice alleges a number of claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"). In its Motion, the government states Davis-Rice previously filed two FTCA cases, and argues the instant complaint is "substantially similar" to the complaints in those prior cases. (See Mot. at 7:26-28.) One of the cases, Davis-Rice v. United States, et al., 07-6483 (N.D. Cal.), was before the undersigned and was dismissed without prejudice by reason of Davis-Rice's failure to pay the filing fee. The other, Davis-Rice v. United States, et al., 07-2072 (D. D.C.), was filed in the District of Columbia ("the D.C. Case"); the government states the District of Columbia thereafter transferred the case to the District of the Virgin Islands, but does not provide any information regarding the status of the case after said transfer. (See Mot. at 6:15-7:1.) Whether the D.C. Case is still pending and, if not, the manner in which the case was resolved, may bear on the Court's determination as to whether the above-titled case should proceed. (See Order Re Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, filed July 7, 2011 (granting Davis-Rice's application)); Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, action brought in forma pauperis subject to dismissal where complaint "merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims").

Accordingly, the government is hereby DIRECTED to file a supplemental brief, no later than November 4, 2011, addressing the status of the D.C. Case after its transfer to the District of the Virgin Islands. Davis-Rice shall file any supplemental opposition no later than November 18, 2011. In light of this order, the hearing on the Motion, currently scheduled for October 21, 2011, is hereby CONTINUED to December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for October 21, 2011 is hereby CONTINUED to January 27, 2012 at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis-Rice v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. C 11-3203 MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Davis-Rice v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ASTARTE DAVIS-RICE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-3203 MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)