From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis-Murray v. State

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 6, 2024
23-cv-01816-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-01816-WHO (PR)

08-06-2024

BLAKE DAVIS-MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Blake Davis-Murray has not complied with my instructions to file an amended complaint by July 15, 2024. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with my Order and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Davis-Murray may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) contain an amended complaint on this Court's form.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis-Murray v. State

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 6, 2024
23-cv-01816-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Davis-Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE DAVIS-MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 6, 2024

Citations

23-cv-01816-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2024)