From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 27, 1915
148 P. 137 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4411

Opinion Filed April 27, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Error from District Court, McIntosh County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge.

Action by Charles S. Vaughn against J.H. Osborne and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants Charles E. Davis and others bring error. Dismissed.

T.W. Jones, Jr. and E.V. Vernor, for plaintiffs in error.

C.B. McCrory, for defendants in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in the case was filed in this court on September 30, 1912, Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Davis v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 27, 1915
148 P. 137 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Davis v. Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS et al. v. VAUGHN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 27, 1915

Citations

148 P. 137 (Okla. 1915)
148 P. 137

Citing Cases

Vaughn v. Osborne

The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the lower…