Johnson v. Mutual Federal Savings c. Assn. of Atlanta, 225 Ga. 245 ( 167 S.E.2d 653) (1969). See also Pace Constr. Corp. v. Houdaille Indus., Inc., 245 Ga. 696, 697 ( 266 S.E.2d 504) (1980); Kingsbury v. Exxon Co., U.S.A., 234 Ga. 144 ( 215 S.E.2d 1) (1975); Bonny Corp. v. McCarthy, 227 Ga. 460, 461 ( 181 S.E.2d 370) (1971); D. Davis Co. Rogers Constr. Co. v. Plunkett, 224 Ga. 357 ( 162 S.E.2d 387) (1968). Further, even if the case was one over which the Supreme Court had exclusive jurisdiction, transfer to that court, rather than dismissal.
The case therefore requires only the application of plain and unambiguous provisions of the Georgia Constitution, and is not a case involving the construction of the Constitution of the State, or one in which the constitutionality of any law of the State is drawn in question, within the meaning of the Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par IV ( Code Ann. ยง 2-3704). See Gormley v. Searcy, 179 Ga. 389, 397 ( 175 S.E. 913); Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Suttles, 201 Ga. 84, 103 ( 38 S.E.2d 786); Loomis v. State, 203 Ga. 394, 405 ( 47 S.E.2d 58); D. Davis Co. v. Plunkett, 224 Ga. 357 ( 162 S.E.2d 387); Potts v. State Hwy. Dept., 225 Ga. 6 ( 165 S.E.2d 726). There being no other ground of jurisdiction in this court, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction of the case. Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the Justices concur.